Demographics details for Pittsburg, CA vs Artesia, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pittsburg, CA vs Artesia, NM.
| Data | Pittsburg | Artesia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77,572 | 12,381 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $98,408 | $75,389 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pittsburg vs Artesia
- In Pittsburg, the population is higher at 77,572, compared to 12,381 in Artesia.
- Residents in Pittsburg have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 33.9 years in Artesia.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408 compared to $75,389 in Artesia.
- In Artesia, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Pittsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Artesia at 12%, compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Pittsburg is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Artesia.
Demographics
Demographics Pittsburg vs Artesia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pittsburg | Artesia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | Data is updating |
| White | 9 | 23 |
| Asian | 18 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 55 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Artesia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pittsburg at 15% compared to 0% in Artesia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Artesia at 23% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Pittsburg at 18% compared to 1% in Artesia.
- Artesia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 43% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Artesia at 18%, compared to 14% in Pittsburg.
- In Artesia, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Pittsburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pittsburg | Artesia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 16.7% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pittsburg vs Artesia
- In Artesia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Artesia at 20.6% versus 16.7% in Pittsburg.
- Artesia has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pittsburg at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Artesia.
- Artesia has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Pittsburg and Artesia at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pittsburg | Artesia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.1% (2,439) | 1.7% (212) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (11,263) | 14.4% (1,782) |
| Less than High School | 23.3% (18,048) | 21.6% (2,674) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (11,476) | 12.3% (1,517) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pittsburg vs Artesia
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.7% in Artesia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 14.4% in Artesia.
- More residents in Pittsburg have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 21.6% in Artesia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pittsburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 12.3% in Artesia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.