Demographics details for Piqua, OH vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piqua, OH vs Mcpherson, KS.
| Data | Piqua | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,607 | 13,865 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $55,379 | $69,807 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Piqua vs Mcpherson
- In Piqua, the population is higher at 20,607, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Piqua have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807, compared to $55,379 in Piqua.
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 35.0% in Piqua.
- Piqua has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- The unemployment rate in Piqua is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Piqua vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piqua | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 92 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Piqua vs Mcpherson
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Piqua and Mcpherson at 2%.
- Piqua has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
- Both Piqua and Mcpherson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Piqua.
- Both Piqua and Mcpherson have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Piqua and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piqua | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piqua vs Mcpherson
- More residents in Piqua report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piqua at 23.9% compared to 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piqua at 23.2% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Piqua.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piqua at 42.0% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Piqua and Mcpherson at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piqua | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (109) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (5,047) | 12.8% (1,775) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (2,775) | 5.8% (804) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.9% (1,835) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piqua vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of residents in Piqua have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piqua hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- More residents in Piqua have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 8.9% in Piqua.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.