Demographics details for Piqua, OH vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piqua, OH vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Piqua | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,607 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,379 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Piqua vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 20,607 in Piqua.
- Residents in Piqua have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $55,379 in Piqua.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Piqua.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 10% in Piqua.
- The unemployment rate in Piqua is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Piqua vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piqua | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 15 |
| White | 92 | 67 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Piqua vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 2% in Piqua.
- Piqua has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Piqua.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 1% in Piqua.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 4% in Piqua.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Piqua and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piqua | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piqua vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.8% in Piqua.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 23.9% in Piqua.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piqua at 23.2% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Piqua at 17.2% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piqua at 42.0% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piqua at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piqua | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (109) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (5,047) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (2,775) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.9% (1,835) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piqua vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Piqua.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piqua hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Piqua have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 8.9% in Piqua.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.