Demographics details for Piper city, IL vs Peabody, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piper city, IL vs Peabody, MA.
| Data | Piper city | Peabody |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 729 | 53,896 |
| Median Age | 48.3 years | 46.9 years |
| Median Income | $38,750 | $91,125 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Piper city vs Peabody
- The population in Peabody is higher at 53,896, compared to 729 in Piper city.
- Residents in Piper city have a higher median age of 48.3 years compared to 46.9 years in Peabody.
- Peabody has a higher median income of $91,125, compared to $38,750 in Piper city.
- In Peabody, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Piper city.
- Piper city has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Peabody.
- Peabody has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.2% in Piper city.
Demographics
Demographics Piper city vs Peabody provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piper city | Peabody |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 94 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Piper city vs Peabody
- In Peabody, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Piper city.
- Piper city has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 76% in Peabody.
- In Peabody, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Piper city.
- Peabody has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Piper city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Peabody at 7%, compared to 1% in Piper city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Piper city and Peabody at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piper city | Peabody |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 13.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piper city vs Peabody
- More residents in Piper city report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.0% in Peabody.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Peabody at 23.9% versus 23.2% in Piper city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piper city at 20.6% compared to 13.9% in Peabody.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Peabody at 18.2% compared to 17.3% in Piper city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piper city at 38.4% compared to 29.5% in Peabody.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piper city at 26.0% compared to 15.0% in Peabody.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piper city | Peabody |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 1.3% (684) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (221) | 20.9% (11,254) |
| Less than High School | 10.8% (79) | 12.4% (6,683) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.8% (42) | 26.1% (14,060) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piper city vs Peabody
- In Peabody, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.1% in Piper city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piper city hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 20.9% in Peabody.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Peabody at 12.4%, compared to 10.8% in Piper city.
- In Peabody, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 5.8% in Piper city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.