Demographics details for Piper city, IL vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piper city, IL vs Carthage, MS.
| Data | Piper city | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 729 | 4,813 |
| Median Age | 48.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $38,750 | $47,722 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Piper city vs Carthage
- The population in Carthage is higher at 4,813, compared to 729 in Piper city.
- Residents in Piper city have a higher median age of 48.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher median income of $47,722, compared to $38,750 in Piper city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Piper city at 40.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 11% in Piper city.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Piper city.
Demographics
Demographics Piper city vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piper city | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 45 |
| White | 94 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Piper city vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 2% in Piper city.
- Piper city has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- Both Piper city and Carthage have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Piper city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Piper city at 1% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Piper city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piper city | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piper city vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.8% in Piper city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piper city at 23.2% compared to 21.6% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 20.6% in Piper city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Piper city at 17.3% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 38.4% in Piper city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piper city at 26.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piper city | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 3.0% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 30.3% (221) | 16.7% (806) |
| Less than High School | 10.8% (79) | 16.9% (811) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.8% (42) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piper city vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.1% in Piper city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piper city hold a high school diploma at 30.3% compared to 16.7% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 16.9%, compared to 10.8% in Piper city.
- In Carthage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 5.8% in Piper city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.