Demographics details for Pinellas park, FL vs Shasta lake, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pinellas park, FL vs Shasta lake, CA.

Data Pinellas park Shasta lake
Population 53,653 10,335
Median Age 43.9 years 38.8 years
Median Income $62,306 $54,490
Married Families 38.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 5.1

Population Comparison: Pinellas park vs Shasta lake

  • In Pinellas park, the population is higher at 53,653, compared to 10,335 in Shasta lake.
  • Residents in Pinellas park have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
  • Pinellas park has a higher median income of $62,306 compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pinellas park at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
  • The poverty level is higher in Shasta lake at 12%, compared to 10% in Pinellas park.
  • Shasta lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.3% in Pinellas park.

Demographics

Demographics Pinellas park vs Shasta lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pinellas park Shasta lake
Black 6 Data is updating
White 62 74
Asian 11 1
Hispanic 13 12
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Pinellas park vs Shasta lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pinellas park at 6% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Shasta lake at 74% compared to 62% in Pinellas park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pinellas park at 11% compared to 1% in Shasta lake.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pinellas park at 13% compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shasta lake at 11%, compared to 8% in Pinellas park.
  • In Shasta lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Pinellas park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pinellas park Shasta lake
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 13.2%
Depression 19.6% 22.9%
Smoking 22.3% 17.4%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 17.5%
Obesity 27.8% 32.5%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pinellas park vs Shasta lake

  • In Shasta lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.8% in Pinellas park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shasta lake at 22.9% versus 19.6% in Pinellas park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pinellas park at 22.3% compared to 17.4% in Shasta lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Shasta lake at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Pinellas park.
  • Shasta lake has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 27.8% in Pinellas park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Pinellas park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pinellas park Shasta lake
No Schooling 2.6% (1,420) 0.6% (67)
High School Diploma 17.5% (9,393) 17.0% (1,759)
Less than High School 19.3% (10,338) 11.4% (1,176)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.9% (9,620) 9.2% (946)

Education Levels Comparison: Pinellas park vs Shasta lake

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pinellas park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.6% in Shasta lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pinellas park hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
  • More residents in Pinellas park have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 11.4% in Shasta lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pinellas park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.