Demographics details for Pinellas park, FL vs Flint, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pinellas park, FL vs Flint, MI.
| Data | Pinellas park | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,653 | 79,854 |
| Median Age | 43.9 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $62,306 | $35,451 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 32% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 10.4 |
Population Comparison: Pinellas park vs Flint
- The population in Flint is higher at 79,854, compared to 53,653 in Pinellas park.
- Residents in Pinellas park have a higher median age of 43.9 years compared to 36.1 years in Flint.
- Pinellas park has a higher median income of $62,306 compared to $35,451 in Flint.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pinellas park at 38.0% compared to 20.0% in Flint.
- The poverty level is higher in Flint at 32%, compared to 10% in Pinellas park.
- Flint has a higher unemployment rate at 10.4% compared to 3.3% in Pinellas park.
Demographics
Demographics Pinellas park vs Flint provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pinellas park | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 58 |
| White | 62 | 30 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pinellas park vs Flint
- In Flint, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 6% in Pinellas park.
- Pinellas park has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 30% in Flint.
- The Asian population is larger in Pinellas park at 11% compared to 1% in Flint.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pinellas park at 13% compared to 4% in Flint.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pinellas park at 8% compared to 7% in Flint.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pinellas park and Flint at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pinellas park | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 17.3% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 29.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 27.8% | 51.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pinellas park vs Flint
- In Flint, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 16.8% in Pinellas park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flint at 25.6% versus 19.6% in Pinellas park.
- Flint has a higher smoking rate at 29.5% compared to 22.3% in Pinellas park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pinellas park at 17.1% compared to 14.0% in Flint.
- Flint has higher obesity rates at 51.7% compared to 27.8% in Pinellas park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flint at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Pinellas park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pinellas park | Flint |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (1,420) | 0.8% (629) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (9,393) | 20.2% (16,121) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (10,338) | 15.3% (12,181) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (9,620) | 8.3% (6,616) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pinellas park vs Flint
- A higher percentage of residents in Pinellas park have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.8% in Flint.
- In Flint, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 17.5% in Pinellas park.
- More residents in Pinellas park have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 15.3% in Flint.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pinellas park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 8.3% in Flint.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.