Demographics details for Pine, AZ vs Fort thomas, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pine, AZ vs Fort thomas, KY.
| Data | Pine | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,526 | 17,133 |
| Median Age | 68.7 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,720 | $95,391 |
| Married Families | 64.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Pine vs Fort thomas
- The population in Fort thomas is higher at 17,133, compared to 1,526 in Pine.
- Residents in Pine have a higher median age of 68.7 years compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391, compared to $54,720 in Pine.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pine at 64.0% compared to 45.0% in Fort thomas.
- Pine has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- The unemployment rate in Pine is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Pine vs Fort thomas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pine | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 96 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pine vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Pine.
- Pine has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 92% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Pine.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pine at 4% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort thomas at 4%, compared to 0% in Pine.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pine and Fort thomas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pine | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 31.2% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 36.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pine vs Fort thomas
- More residents in Pine report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort thomas at 26.2% versus 20.3% in Pine.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pine at 15.0% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pine at 21.2% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 31.2% in Pine.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pine at 36.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pine | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (66) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (328) | 10.7% (1,840) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (58) | 3.3% (569) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.6% (406) | 37.3% (6,383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pine vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Pine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pine hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- More residents in Pine have less than a high school education at 3.8% compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 26.6% in Pine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.