Demographics details for Piggott, AR vs Severna park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piggott, AR vs Severna park, MD.
| Data | Piggott | Severna park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,545 | 40,452 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,255 | $164,288 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Piggott vs Severna park
- The population in Severna park is higher at 40,452, compared to 3,545 in Piggott.
- The median age in Severna park is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 37.6 years in Piggott.
- Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288, compared to $43,255 in Piggott.
- In Severna park, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 35.0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 3% in Severna park.
- The unemployment rate in Piggott is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Severna park.
Demographics
Demographics Piggott vs Severna park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piggott | Severna park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 96 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Piggott vs Severna park
- In Severna park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 86% in Severna park.
- In Severna park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Piggott.
- Severna park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Piggott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Severna park at 5%, compared to 2% in Piggott.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Piggott at 1% compared to 0% in Severna park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piggott | Severna park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 29.5% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 9.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 31.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piggott vs Severna park
- More residents in Piggott report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 13.1% in Severna park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piggott at 29.5% compared to 19.9% in Severna park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piggott at 23.9% compared to 9.0% in Severna park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 15.0% in Piggott.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piggott at 39.2% compared to 31.9% in Severna park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piggott at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Severna park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piggott | Severna park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (14) | 0.4% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (746) | 10.9% (4,392) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (423) | 4.3% (1,731) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (414) | 38.1% (15,411) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piggott vs Severna park
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Piggott and Severna park at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piggott hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 10.9% in Severna park.
- More residents in Piggott have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 4.3% in Severna park.
- In Severna park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 11.7% in Piggott.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.