Demographics details for Piggott, AR vs Selma, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piggott, AR vs Selma, OR.
| Data | Piggott | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,545 | 892 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $43,255 | $42,319 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Piggott vs Selma
- In Piggott, the population is higher at 3,545, compared to 892 in Selma.
- Residents in Piggott have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 36.6 years in Selma.
- Piggott has a higher median income of $43,255 compared to $42,319 in Selma.
- In Selma, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 35.0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 13% in Selma.
- Selma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Piggott.
Demographics
Demographics Piggott vs Selma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piggott | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 96 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Piggott vs Selma
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Piggott and Selma at 0%.
- Piggott has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 95% in Selma.
- Both Piggott and Selma have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Piggott and Selma at 1%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Selma at 4%, compared to 2% in Piggott.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Piggott at 1% compared to 0% in Selma.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piggott | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 29.5% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 30.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piggott vs Selma
- More residents in Piggott report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 18.4% in Selma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piggott at 29.5% compared to 26.9% in Selma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piggott at 23.9% compared to 17.0% in Selma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Selma at 18.4% compared to 15.0% in Piggott.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piggott at 39.2% compared to 30.7% in Selma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Selma at 28.0% compared to 16.0% in Piggott.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piggott | Selma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (14) | 1.5% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (746) | 15.9% (142) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (423) | 8.3% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (414) | 1.7% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piggott vs Selma
- In Selma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.4% in Piggott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piggott hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 15.9% in Selma.
- More residents in Piggott have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 8.3% in Selma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piggott hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 1.7% in Selma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.