Demographics details for Piggott, AR vs Rancho cucamonga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piggott, AR vs Rancho cucamonga, CA.
| Data | Piggott | Rancho cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,545 | 176,336 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,255 | $105,534 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Piggott vs Rancho cucamonga
- The population in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 176,336, compared to 3,545 in Piggott.
- Residents in Piggott have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534, compared to $43,255 in Piggott.
- In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Piggott.
Demographics
Demographics Piggott vs Rancho cucamonga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piggott | Rancho cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 96 | 22 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 39 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Piggott vs Rancho cucamonga
- In Rancho cucamonga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
- In Rancho cucamonga, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Piggott.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 1% in Piggott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rancho cucamonga at 15%, compared to 2% in Piggott.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Piggott and Rancho cucamonga at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piggott | Rancho cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 29.5% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piggott vs Rancho cucamonga
- More residents in Piggott report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piggott at 29.5% compared to 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piggott at 23.9% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rancho cucamonga at 16.6% compared to 15.0% in Piggott.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piggott at 39.2% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piggott at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piggott | Rancho cucamonga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (14) | 1.2% (2,052) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (746) | 11.7% (20,590) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (423) | 10.0% (17,566) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (414) | 25.3% (44,534) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piggott vs Rancho cucamonga
- In Rancho cucamonga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Piggott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piggott hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
- More residents in Piggott have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
- In Rancho cucamonga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 11.7% in Piggott.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.