Demographics details for Piggott, AR vs Marshalltown, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piggott, AR vs Marshalltown, IA.
Data | Piggott | Marshalltown |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,545 | 27,433 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $43,255 | $65,000 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Piggott vs Marshalltown
- The population in Marshalltown is higher at 27,433, compared to 3,545 in Piggott.
- Residents in Piggott have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 35.5 years in Marshalltown.
- Marshalltown has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $43,255 in Piggott.
- In Marshalltown, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Marshalltown.
- Marshalltown has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Piggott.
Demographics
Demographics Piggott vs Marshalltown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Piggott | Marshalltown |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 96 | 45 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 1 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Piggott vs Marshalltown
- In Marshalltown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 45% in Marshalltown.
- In Marshalltown, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Piggott.
- Marshalltown has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 1% in Piggott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshalltown at 12%, compared to 2% in Piggott.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Piggott and Marshalltown at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Piggott | Marshalltown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 11.6% |
Depression | 29.5% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 23.9% | 20.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piggott vs Marshalltown
- More residents in Piggott report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.6% in Marshalltown.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piggott at 29.5% compared to 23.0% in Marshalltown.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piggott at 23.9% compared to 20.7% in Marshalltown.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Marshalltown at 19.4% compared to 15.0% in Piggott.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piggott at 39.2% compared to 38.6% in Marshalltown.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piggott at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Marshalltown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Piggott | Marshalltown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (14) | 2.4% (646) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (746) | 17.3% (4,740) |
Less than High School | 11.9% (423) | 23.6% (6,481) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (414) | 12.2% (3,347) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piggott vs Marshalltown
- In Marshalltown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.4% in Piggott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piggott hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 17.3% in Marshalltown.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Marshalltown at 23.6%, compared to 11.9% in Piggott.
- In Marshalltown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 11.7% in Piggott.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.