Demographics details for Piggott, AR vs Garfield, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piggott, AR vs Garfield, WA.
Data | Piggott | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,545 | 2,363 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 49.9 years |
Median Income | $43,255 | $57,958 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 57.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Piggott vs Garfield
- In Piggott, the population is higher at 3,545, compared to 2,363 in Garfield.
- The median age in Garfield is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 37.6 years in Piggott.
- Garfield has a higher median income of $57,958, compared to $43,255 in Piggott.
- In Garfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 35.0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Garfield.
- Garfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.5% in Piggott.
Demographics
Demographics Piggott vs Garfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Piggott | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 96 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Piggott vs Garfield
- In Garfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Piggott.
- Piggott has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 88% in Garfield.
- In Garfield, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Piggott.
- Garfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Piggott.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garfield at 6%, compared to 2% in Piggott.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Piggott at 1% compared to 0% in Garfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Piggott | Garfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 11.0% |
Depression | 29.5% | 28.7% |
Smoking | 23.9% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piggott vs Garfield
- More residents in Piggott report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.2% in Garfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piggott at 29.5% compared to 28.7% in Garfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piggott at 23.9% compared to 14.6% in Garfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garfield at 18.2% compared to 15.0% in Piggott.
- Garfield has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 39.2% in Piggott.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Garfield at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Piggott.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Piggott | Garfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (14) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (746) | 15.7% (371) |
Less than High School | 11.9% (423) | 10.2% (242) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (414) | 19.4% (458) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piggott vs Garfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Piggott have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Garfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piggott hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 15.7% in Garfield.
- More residents in Piggott have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 10.2% in Garfield.
- In Garfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 11.7% in Piggott.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.