Demographics details for Piffard, NY vs Montezuma, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piffard, NY vs Montezuma, GA.
| Data | Piffard | Montezuma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 248 | 2,958 |
| Median Age | 69.3 years | 43.2 years |
| Median Income | $49,052 | $46,315 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Piffard vs Montezuma
- The population in Montezuma is higher at 2,958, compared to 248 in Piffard.
- Residents in Piffard have a higher median age of 69.3 years compared to 43.2 years in Montezuma.
- Piffard has a higher median income of $49,052 compared to $46,315 in Montezuma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Piffard at 31.0% compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
- The poverty level is higher in Montezuma at 19%, compared to 8% in Piffard.
- Montezuma has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Piffard.
Demographics
Demographics Piffard vs Montezuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piffard | Montezuma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 79 |
| White | 100 | 15 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Piffard vs Montezuma
- In Montezuma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 79% compared to 0% in Piffard.
- Piffard has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 15% in Montezuma.
- In Montezuma, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Piffard.
- Montezuma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Piffard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Montezuma at 1%, compared to 0% in Piffard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Piffard and Montezuma at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piffard | Montezuma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.7% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | 23.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piffard vs Montezuma
- In Montezuma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.5% in Piffard.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piffard at 27.4% compared to 19.7% in Montezuma.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piffard at 25.3% compared to 23.8% in Montezuma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Piffard at 18.0% compared to 11.9% in Montezuma.
- Montezuma has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 43.7% in Piffard.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piffard at 33.0% compared to 15.0% in Montezuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piffard | Montezuma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 12.5% (31) | 0.2% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (52) | 24.9% (737) |
| Less than High School | 25.0% (62) | 11.3% (335) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (35) | 11.3% (333) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piffard vs Montezuma
- A higher percentage of residents in Piffard have no formal schooling at 12.5% compared to 0.2% in Montezuma.
- In Montezuma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 21.0% in Piffard.
- More residents in Piffard have less than a high school education at 25.0% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piffard hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.