Demographics details for Piffard, NY vs Dawson, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piffard, NY vs Dawson, GA.
| Data | Piffard | Dawson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 248 | 30,138 |
| Median Age | 69.3 years | 43.9 years |
| Median Income | $49,052 | $84,516 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Piffard vs Dawson
- The population in Dawson is higher at 30,138, compared to 248 in Piffard.
- Residents in Piffard have a higher median age of 69.3 years compared to 43.9 years in Dawson.
- Dawson has a higher median income of $84,516, compared to $49,052 in Piffard.
- In Dawson, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 31.0% in Piffard.
- The poverty level is higher in Dawson at 16%, compared to 8% in Piffard.
- Dawson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.2% in Piffard.
Demographics
Demographics Piffard vs Dawson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Piffard | Dawson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 100 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Piffard vs Dawson
- In Dawson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Piffard.
- Piffard has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 88% in Dawson.
- In Dawson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Piffard.
- Dawson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Piffard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dawson at 5%, compared to 0% in Piffard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Piffard and Dawson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Piffard | Dawson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 27.4% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 25.3% | 14.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piffard vs Dawson
- More residents in Piffard report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.7% in Dawson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piffard at 27.4% compared to 22.1% in Dawson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piffard at 25.3% compared to 14.7% in Dawson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dawson at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in Piffard.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piffard at 43.7% compared to 32.5% in Dawson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piffard at 33.0% compared to 13.0% in Dawson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Piffard | Dawson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 12.5% (31) | 1.5% (446) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (52) | 11.2% (3,376) |
| Less than High School | 25.0% (62) | 15.3% (4,610) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (35) | 23.0% (6,943) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piffard vs Dawson
- A higher percentage of residents in Piffard have no formal schooling at 12.5% compared to 1.5% in Dawson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piffard hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 11.2% in Dawson.
- More residents in Piffard have less than a high school education at 25.0% compared to 15.3% in Dawson.
- In Dawson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 14.1% in Piffard.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.