Demographics details for Piffard, NY vs Carson city, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Piffard, NY vs Carson city, NV.
Data | Piffard | Carson city |
---|---|---|
Population | 248 | 58,130 |
Median Age | 69.3 years | 42.1 years |
Median Income | $49,052 | $67,465 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Piffard vs Carson city
- The population in Carson city is higher at 58,130, compared to 248 in Piffard.
- Residents in Piffard have a higher median age of 69.3 years compared to 42.1 years in Carson city.
- Carson city has a higher median income of $67,465, compared to $49,052 in Piffard.
- In Carson city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Piffard.
- The poverty level is higher in Carson city at 12%, compared to 8% in Piffard.
- Carson city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.2% in Piffard.
Demographics
Demographics Piffard vs Carson city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Piffard | Carson city |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 100 | 58 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Piffard vs Carson city
- In Carson city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Piffard.
- Piffard has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 58% in Carson city.
- In Carson city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Piffard.
- Carson city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Piffard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carson city at 10%, compared to 0% in Piffard.
- In Carson city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Piffard.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Piffard | Carson city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.6% |
Depression | 27.4% | 21.5% |
Smoking | 25.3% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 43.7% | 32.6% |
Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Piffard vs Carson city
- More residents in Piffard report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.1% in Carson city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Piffard at 27.4% compared to 21.5% in Carson city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Piffard at 25.3% compared to 17.8% in Carson city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Piffard at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in Carson city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Piffard at 43.7% compared to 32.6% in Carson city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Piffard at 33.0% compared to 15.0% in Carson city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Piffard | Carson city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 12.5% (31) | 1.2% (690) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (52) | 14.9% (8,674) |
Less than High School | 25.0% (62) | 15.4% (8,968) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (35) | 17.6% (10,205) |
Education Levels Comparison: Piffard vs Carson city
- A higher percentage of residents in Piffard have no formal schooling at 12.5% compared to 1.2% in Carson city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Piffard hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 14.9% in Carson city.
- More residents in Piffard have less than a high school education at 25.0% compared to 15.4% in Carson city.
- In Carson city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 14.1% in Piffard.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.