Demographics details for Picayune, MS vs Palmer, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Picayune, MS vs Palmer, MA.
| Data | Picayune | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,826 | 3,900 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $35,649 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Picayune vs Palmer
- In Picayune, the population is higher at 11,826, compared to 3,900 in Palmer.
- The median age in Palmer is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Palmer has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Palmer, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 10% in Palmer.
- The unemployment rate in Picayune is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Palmer.
Demographics
Demographics Picayune vs Palmer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Picayune | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Picayune vs Palmer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Picayune at 38% compared to 1% in Palmer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palmer at 96% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- In Palmer, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Picayune.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Picayune and Palmer at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Picayune at 5% compared to 0% in Palmer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Picayune and Palmer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Picayune | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.0% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Picayune vs Palmer
- More residents in Picayune report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Picayune at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Picayune at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Binge drinking is more common in Picayune at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Obesity rates are higher in Picayune at 44.0% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- Disability percentages are higher in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Picayune | Palmer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (2,108) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (1,392) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,200) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Picayune vs Palmer
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- More residents in Picayune have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 0.0% in Palmer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.