Demographics details for Picayune, MS vs Grinnell, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Picayune, MS vs Grinnell, KS.
| Data | Picayune | Grinnell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,826 | 254 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $35,649 | $56,042 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Picayune vs Grinnell
- In Picayune, the population is higher at 11,826, compared to 254 in Grinnell.
- Residents in Picayune have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 37.9 years in Grinnell.
- Grinnell has a higher median income of $56,042, compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Grinnell, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 12% in Grinnell.
- The unemployment rate in Picayune is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Grinnell.
Demographics
Demographics Picayune vs Grinnell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Picayune | Grinnell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Picayune vs Grinnell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Picayune at 38% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grinnell at 100% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- Both Picayune and Grinnell have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Picayune at 2% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Picayune at 5% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Picayune and Grinnell at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Picayune | Grinnell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Picayune vs Grinnell
- More residents in Picayune report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.1% in Grinnell.
- Depression is more prevalent in Picayune at 24.0% compared to 20.1% in Grinnell.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Picayune at 23.3% compared to 17.6% in Grinnell.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grinnell at 20.4% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Obesity rates are higher in Picayune at 44.0% compared to 38.3% in Grinnell.
- Disability percentages are higher in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Grinnell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Picayune | Grinnell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (2,108) | 18.9% (48) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (1,392) | 16.5% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,200) | 16.9% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Picayune vs Grinnell
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Grinnell.
- In Grinnell, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grinnell at 16.5%, compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- In Grinnell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.