Demographics details for Picayune, MS vs Evansville, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Picayune, MS vs Evansville, IN.
Data | Picayune | Evansville |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,826 | 115,749 |
Median Age | 38.3 years | 38.1 years |
Median Income | $35,649 | $49,853 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 21% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Picayune vs Evansville
- The population in Evansville is higher at 115,749, compared to 11,826 in Picayune.
- Residents in Picayune have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 38.1 years in Evansville.
- Evansville has a higher median income of $49,853, compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Evansville, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 13% in Evansville.
- The unemployment rate in Picayune is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.4% in Evansville.
Demographics
Demographics Picayune vs Evansville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Picayune | Evansville |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | 14 |
White | 55 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Picayune vs Evansville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Picayune at 38% compared to 14% in Evansville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Evansville at 76% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- In Evansville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Picayune.
- Evansville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Picayune.
- Both Picayune and Evansville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Picayune and Evansville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Picayune | Evansville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.8% |
Depression | 24.0% | 27.6% |
Smoking | 23.3% | 23.2% |
Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 44.0% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Picayune vs Evansville
- In Evansville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.4% in Picayune.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Evansville at 27.6% versus 24.0% in Picayune.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Picayune at 23.3% compared to 23.2% in Evansville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Evansville at 15.9% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Evansville has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 44.0% in Picayune.
- Disability percentages are higher in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Evansville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Picayune | Evansville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 0.8% (939) |
High School Diploma | 17.8% (2,108) | 20.0% (23,144) |
Less than High School | 11.8% (1,392) | 13.6% (15,701) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,200) | 15.7% (18,125) |
Education Levels Comparison: Picayune vs Evansville
- In Evansville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- In Evansville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Evansville at 13.6%, compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- In Evansville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.