Demographics details for Picayune, MS vs Chapman, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Picayune, MS vs Chapman, KS.
| Data | Picayune | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,826 | 1,371 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $35,649 | $66,964 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Picayune vs Chapman
- In Picayune, the population is higher at 11,826, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- The median age in Chapman is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Chapman has a higher median income of $66,964, compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Chapman, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 8% in Chapman.
- The unemployment rate in Picayune is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Picayune vs Chapman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Picayune | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 81 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Picayune vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Picayune at 38% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chapman at 81% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- In Chapman, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Picayune.
- Chapman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chapman at 7%, compared to 5% in Picayune.
- In Chapman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Picayune | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Picayune vs Chapman
- More residents in Picayune report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.7% in Chapman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Picayune at 24.0% compared to 21.4% in Chapman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Picayune at 23.3% compared to 16.6% in Chapman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Obesity rates are higher in Picayune at 44.0% compared to 37.3% in Chapman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Chapman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Picayune | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (2,108) | 12.3% (168) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (1,392) | 5.1% (70) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,200) | 15.5% (212) |
Education Levels Comparison: Picayune vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 12.3% in Chapman.
- More residents in Picayune have less than a high school education at 11.8% compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
- In Chapman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.