Demographics details for Picayune, MS vs Chandler, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Picayune, MS vs Chandler, OK.
| Data | Picayune | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,826 | 2,895 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $35,649 | $48,168 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Picayune vs Chandler
- In Picayune, the population is higher at 11,826, compared to 2,895 in Chandler.
- The median age in Chandler is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Chandler has a higher median income of $48,168, compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Chandler, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 13% in Chandler.
- The unemployment rate in Picayune is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Picayune vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Picayune | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | 9 |
| White | 55 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Picayune vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Picayune at 38% compared to 9% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 72% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Picayune at 2% compared to 1% in Chandler.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 5% in Picayune.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Picayune.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Picayune | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Picayune vs Chandler
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Picayune and Chandler at 18.4%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chandler at 24.6% versus 24.0% in Picayune.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Picayune at 23.3% compared to 20.3% in Chandler.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Obesity rates are higher in Picayune at 44.0% compared to 41.1% in Chandler.
- Disability percentages are higher in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Chandler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Picayune | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (2,108) | 23.9% (691) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (1,392) | 12.8% (372) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,200) | 16.2% (469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Picayune vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chandler at 12.8%, compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.