Demographics details for Picayune, MS vs Burns, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Picayune, MS vs Burns, KS.
| Data | Picayune | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,826 | 237 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $35,649 | $43,125 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Picayune vs Burns
- In Picayune, the population is higher at 11,826, compared to 237 in Burns.
- Residents in Picayune have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Burns has a higher median income of $43,125, compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Burns, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 14% in Burns.
- The unemployment rate in Picayune is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Picayune vs Burns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Picayune | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Picayune vs Burns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Picayune at 38% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burns at 92% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- Both Picayune and Burns have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Burns has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Picayune at 5% compared to 2% in Burns.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Picayune and Burns at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Picayune | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Picayune vs Burns
- More residents in Picayune report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.5% in Burns.
- Depression is more prevalent in Picayune at 24.0% compared to 21.2% in Burns.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Picayune at 23.3% compared to 17.4% in Burns.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burns at 19.2% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Obesity rates are higher in Picayune at 44.0% compared to 36.5% in Burns.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burns at 23.0% compared to 21.0% in Picayune.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Picayune | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (2,108) | 13.9% (33) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (1,392) | 43.0% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,200) | 6.3% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Picayune vs Burns
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 13.9% in Burns.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burns at 43.0%, compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of residents in Picayune hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 6.3% in Burns.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.