Demographics details for Philomath, OR vs Parker, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Philomath, OR vs Parker, KS.
| Data | Philomath | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,721 | 233 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $80,599 | $80,250 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 73.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Philomath vs Parker
- In Philomath, the population is higher at 5,721, compared to 233 in Parker.
- The median age in Parker is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 36.8 years in Philomath.
- Philomath has a higher median income of $80,599 compared to $80,250 in Parker.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 73.0%, compared to 40.0% in Philomath.
- The poverty level is identical in both Philomath and Parker at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Philomath is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.2% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Philomath vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Philomath | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 78 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Philomath vs Parker
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Philomath and Parker at 0%.
- Philomath has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 78% in Parker.
- The Asian population is larger in Philomath at 2% compared to 0% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 3% in Philomath.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 8%, compared to 4% in Philomath.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Philomath at 2% compared to 0% in Parker.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Philomath | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Philomath vs Parker
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Philomath and Parker at 17.4%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Philomath at 25.4% compared to 22.1% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 13.1% in Philomath.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Philomath.
- Parker has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 28.0% in Philomath.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Parker at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Philomath.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Philomath | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (7) | 5.6% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 11.7% (667) | 37.8% (88) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (254) | 22.3% (52) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.7% (1,643) | 11.6% (27) |
Education Levels Comparison: Philomath vs Parker
- In Parker, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.6% compared to 0.1% in Philomath.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.8% compared to 11.7% in Philomath.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 22.3%, compared to 4.4% in Philomath.
- A higher percentage of residents in Philomath hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.7% compared to 11.6% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.