Demographics details for Phillipsburg, OH vs Savage, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Phillipsburg, OH vs Savage, MN.
| Data | Phillipsburg | Savage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 496 | 32,893 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $56,250 | $123,069 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Phillipsburg vs Savage
- The population in Savage is higher at 32,893, compared to 496 in Phillipsburg.
- The median age in Savage is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 33.6 years in Phillipsburg.
- Savage has a higher median income of $123,069, compared to $56,250 in Phillipsburg.
- In Savage, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 31.0% in Phillipsburg.
- Phillipsburg has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 4% in Savage.
- The unemployment rate in Phillipsburg is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Savage.
Demographics
Demographics Phillipsburg vs Savage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Phillipsburg | Savage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 96 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Phillipsburg vs Savage
- In Savage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Phillipsburg.
- Phillipsburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 74% in Savage.
- In Savage, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Phillipsburg.
- Savage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Phillipsburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Savage at 5%, compared to 0% in Phillipsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Phillipsburg and Savage at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Phillipsburg | Savage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 12.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 7.5% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Phillipsburg vs Savage
- More residents in Phillipsburg report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 12.1% in Savage.
- Depression is more prevalent in Phillipsburg at 26.6% compared to 20.5% in Savage.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Phillipsburg at 19.1% compared to 12.0% in Savage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Phillipsburg at 19.6% compared to 18.9% in Savage.
- Obesity rates are higher in Phillipsburg at 38.2% compared to 32.4% in Savage.
- Disability percentages are higher in Phillipsburg at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Savage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Phillipsburg | Savage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (303) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (84) | 9.0% (2,949) |
| Less than High School | 10.1% (50) | 3.3% (1,095) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.1% (45) | 34.5% (11,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Phillipsburg vs Savage
- In Savage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Phillipsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Phillipsburg hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 9.0% in Savage.
- More residents in Phillipsburg have less than a high school education at 10.1% compared to 3.3% in Savage.
- In Savage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.5% compared to 9.1% in Phillipsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.