Demographics details for Pharr, TX vs New cuyama, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pharr, TX vs New cuyama, CA.
| Data | Pharr | New cuyama |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 80,179 | 669 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 41.3 years |
| Median Income | $45,016 | $55,104 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.6 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Pharr vs New cuyama
- In Pharr, the population is higher at 80,179, compared to 669 in New cuyama.
- The median age in New cuyama is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 29.4 years in Pharr.
- New cuyama has a higher median income of $55,104, compared to $45,016 in Pharr.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pharr at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in New cuyama.
- Pharr has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 15% in New cuyama.
- The unemployment rate in Pharr is higher at 7.6%, compared to 5.2% in New cuyama.
Demographics
Demographics Pharr vs New cuyama provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pharr | New cuyama |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | -26 | 29 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 94 | 52 |
| Two or More Races | 31 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pharr vs New cuyama
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pharr at 1% compared to 0% in New cuyama.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in New cuyama at 29% compared to -26% in Pharr.
- Both Pharr and New cuyama have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pharr at 94% compared to 52% in New cuyama.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pharr at 31% compared to 18% in New cuyama.
- In New cuyama, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pharr.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pharr | New cuyama |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.5% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 14.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 45.4% | 31.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pharr vs New cuyama
- More residents in Pharr report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.8% in New cuyama.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New cuyama at 20.7% versus 19.9% in Pharr.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pharr at 17.0% compared to 14.3% in New cuyama.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New cuyama at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Pharr.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pharr at 45.4% compared to 31.4% in New cuyama.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New cuyama at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Pharr.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pharr | New cuyama |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (1,723) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (10,587) | 20.2% (135) |
| Less than High School | 33.7% (27,024) | 17.3% (116) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (7,741) | 16.9% (113) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pharr vs New cuyama
- A higher percentage of residents in Pharr have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in New cuyama.
- In New cuyama, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 13.2% in Pharr.
- More residents in Pharr have less than a high school education at 33.7% compared to 17.3% in New cuyama.
- In New cuyama, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 9.7% in Pharr.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.