Demographics details for Pflugerville, TX vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pflugerville, TX vs Richland, MS.
| Data | Pflugerville | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 65,556 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $111,151 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Pflugerville vs Richland
- In Pflugerville, the population is higher at 65,556, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- The median age is the same in both Pflugerville and Richland at 37.1 years.
- Pflugerville has a higher median income of $111,151 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pflugerville at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- The poverty level is higher in Richland at 12%, compared to 6% in Pflugerville.
- Richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Pflugerville.
Demographics
Demographics Pflugerville vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pflugerville | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 19 |
| White | 28 | 74 |
| Asian | 8 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pflugerville vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 17% in Pflugerville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richland at 74% compared to 28% in Pflugerville.
- The Asian population is larger in Pflugerville at 8% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pflugerville at 33% compared to 3% in Richland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pflugerville at 14% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pflugerville and Richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pflugerville | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pflugerville vs Richland
- In Richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.2% in Pflugerville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richland at 23.4% versus 20.8% in Pflugerville.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 11.5% in Pflugerville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pflugerville at 19.9% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Richland has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 28.2% in Pflugerville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richland at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Pflugerville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pflugerville | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (519) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (7,925) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (4,951) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.3% (17,919) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pflugerville vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Pflugerville.
- In Richland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 12.1% in Pflugerville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richland at 10.0%, compared to 7.6% in Pflugerville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pflugerville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.