Demographics details for Pflugerville, TX vs Fayetteville, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pflugerville, TX vs Fayetteville, NC.

Data Pflugerville Fayetteville
Population 65,556 208,873
Median Age 37.1 years 30.5 years
Median Income $111,151 $53,424
Married Families 43.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 6% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.1 5.9

Population Comparison: Pflugerville vs Fayetteville

  • The population in Fayetteville is higher at 208,873, compared to 65,556 in Pflugerville.
  • Residents in Pflugerville have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 30.5 years in Fayetteville.
  • Pflugerville has a higher median income of $111,151 compared to $53,424 in Fayetteville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pflugerville at 43.0% compared to 33.0% in Fayetteville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fayetteville at 14%, compared to 6% in Pflugerville.
  • Fayetteville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.1% in Pflugerville.

Demographics

Demographics Pflugerville vs Fayetteville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pflugerville Fayetteville
Black 17 42
White 28 31
Asian 8 3
Hispanic 33 13
Two or More Races 14 10
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Pflugerville vs Fayetteville

  • In Fayetteville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 17% in Pflugerville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fayetteville at 31% compared to 28% in Pflugerville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pflugerville at 8% compared to 3% in Fayetteville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Pflugerville at 33% compared to 13% in Fayetteville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pflugerville at 14% compared to 10% in Fayetteville.
  • In Fayetteville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pflugerville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pflugerville Fayetteville
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 12.1%
Depression 20.8% 24.0%
Smoking 11.5% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 19.9% 16.6%
Obesity 28.2% 40.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pflugerville vs Fayetteville

  • In Fayetteville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.2% in Pflugerville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fayetteville at 24.0% versus 20.8% in Pflugerville.
  • Fayetteville has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 11.5% in Pflugerville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pflugerville at 19.9% compared to 16.6% in Fayetteville.
  • Fayetteville has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 28.2% in Pflugerville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fayetteville at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Pflugerville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pflugerville Fayetteville
No Schooling 0.8% (519) 0.6% (1,184)
High School Diploma 12.1% (7,925) 13.7% (28,602)
Less than High School 7.6% (4,951) 6.1% (12,639)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.3% (17,919) 17.6% (36,676)

Education Levels Comparison: Pflugerville vs Fayetteville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pflugerville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Fayetteville.
  • In Fayetteville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 12.1% in Pflugerville.
  • More residents in Pflugerville have less than a high school education at 7.6% compared to 6.1% in Fayetteville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pflugerville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 17.6% in Fayetteville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.