Demographics details for Petaluma, CA vs Torrington, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Petaluma, CA vs Torrington, CT.
| Data | Petaluma | Torrington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,652 | 35,563 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $108,527 | $66,616 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Petaluma vs Torrington
- In Petaluma, the population is higher at 58,652, compared to 35,563 in Torrington.
- Residents in Petaluma have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 40.8 years in Torrington.
- Petaluma has a higher median income of $108,527 compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Petaluma at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
- The poverty level is higher in Torrington at 9%, compared to 7% in Petaluma.
- The unemployment rate in Petaluma is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.8% in Torrington.
Demographics
Demographics Petaluma vs Torrington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Petaluma | Torrington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 10 |
| White | 62 | 61 |
| Asian | 5 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Petaluma vs Torrington
- In Torrington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Petaluma.
- Petaluma has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 61% in Torrington.
- The Asian population is larger in Petaluma at 5% compared to 3% in Torrington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Petaluma at 20% compared to 17% in Torrington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Petaluma at 11% compared to 9% in Torrington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Petaluma at 1% compared to 0% in Torrington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Petaluma | Torrington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 10.5% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 27.5% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Petaluma vs Torrington
- In Torrington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.1% in Petaluma.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Torrington at 23.3% versus 20.1% in Petaluma.
- Torrington has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 10.5% in Petaluma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Petaluma at 20.4% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
- Torrington has higher obesity rates at 28.8% compared to 27.5% in Petaluma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Petaluma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Petaluma | Torrington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (558) | 1.2% (425) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (6,434) | 22.6% (8,040) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (6,496) | 16.1% (5,736) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.4% (18,996) | 17.7% (6,279) |
Education Levels Comparison: Petaluma vs Torrington
- In Torrington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Petaluma.
- In Torrington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 11.0% in Petaluma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Torrington at 16.1%, compared to 11.1% in Petaluma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Petaluma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.4% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.