Demographics details for Petaluma, CA vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Petaluma, CA vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Petaluma | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,652 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 43.5 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $108,527 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Petaluma vs Fairburn
- In Petaluma, the population is higher at 58,652, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- Residents in Petaluma have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Petaluma has a higher median income of $108,527 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Petaluma at 44.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 7% in Petaluma.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Petaluma.
Demographics
Demographics Petaluma vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Petaluma | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 73 |
| White | 62 | 12 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Petaluma vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 1% in Petaluma.
- Petaluma has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Petaluma at 5% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Petaluma at 20% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Petaluma at 11% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Petaluma at 1% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Petaluma | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 10.5% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 27.5% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Petaluma vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 15.1% in Petaluma.
- Depression is more prevalent in Petaluma at 20.1% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 10.5% in Petaluma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Petaluma at 20.4% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 27.5% in Petaluma.
- Disability percentages are higher in Petaluma at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Petaluma | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (558) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (6,434) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (6,496) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.4% (18,996) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Petaluma vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Petaluma have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 11.0% in Petaluma.
- More residents in Petaluma have less than a high school education at 11.1% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Petaluma hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.4% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.