Demographics details for Pesotum, IL vs Frankfort, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pesotum, IL vs Frankfort, KY.
| Data | Pesotum | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 547 | 28,391 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 34.2 years |
| Median Income | $80,938 | $53,905 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pesotum vs Frankfort
- The population in Frankfort is higher at 28,391, compared to 547 in Pesotum.
- Residents in Pesotum have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 34.2 years in Frankfort.
- Pesotum has a higher median income of $80,938 compared to $53,905 in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pesotum at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Frankfort.
- The poverty level is higher in Frankfort at 12%, compared to 5% in Pesotum.
- Frankfort has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Pesotum.
Demographics
Demographics Pesotum vs Frankfort provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pesotum | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 12 |
| White | 95 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pesotum vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in Pesotum.
- Pesotum has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 71% in Frankfort.
- In Frankfort, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Pesotum.
- Frankfort has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Pesotum.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Frankfort at 8%, compared to 2% in Pesotum.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pesotum at 1% compared to 0% in Frankfort.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pesotum | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 30.9% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pesotum vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.5% in Pesotum.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Frankfort at 26.4% versus 21.9% in Pesotum.
- Frankfort has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 15.0% in Pesotum.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pesotum at 19.0% compared to 14.5% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 30.9% in Pesotum.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Pesotum.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pesotum | Frankfort |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (89) |
| High School Diploma | 26.1% (143) | 15.3% (4,339) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (24) | 11.5% (3,279) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (90) | 18.7% (5,295) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pesotum vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Pesotum.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pesotum hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 15.3% in Frankfort.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Frankfort at 11.5%, compared to 4.4% in Pesotum.
- In Frankfort, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 16.5% in Pesotum.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.