Demographics details for Perryville, MO vs Clinton, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Perryville, MO vs Clinton, SC.
| Data | Perryville | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,488 | 7,554 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $52,500 | $38,350 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Perryville vs Clinton
- In Perryville, the population is higher at 8,488, compared to 7,554 in Clinton.
- Residents in Perryville have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 35.4 years in Clinton.
- Perryville has a higher median income of $52,500 compared to $38,350 in Clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Perryville at 36.0% compared to 19.0% in Clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Clinton at 18%, compared to 10% in Perryville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Perryville and Clinton at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Perryville vs Clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Perryville | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | 88 | 55 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Perryville vs Clinton
- In Clinton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Perryville.
- Perryville has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 55% in Clinton.
- Both Perryville and Clinton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Perryville at 4% compared to 1% in Clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Perryville at 5% compared to 4% in Clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Perryville and Clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Perryville | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 44.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Perryville vs Clinton
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Perryville and Clinton at 19.1%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Perryville at 26.5% compared to 23.7% in Clinton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Perryville at 22.7% compared to 22.0% in Clinton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Perryville at 18.9% compared to 15.8% in Clinton.
- Clinton has higher obesity rates at 44.9% compared to 38.6% in Perryville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clinton at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Perryville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Perryville | Clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (77) | 1.0% (74) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (1,931) | 19.3% (1,460) |
| Less than High School | 18.9% (1,606) | 15.6% (1,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (1,097) | 17.3% (1,310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Perryville vs Clinton
- In Clinton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Perryville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Perryville hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 19.3% in Clinton.
- More residents in Perryville have less than a high school education at 18.9% compared to 15.6% in Clinton.
- In Clinton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 12.9% in Perryville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.