Demographics details for Perrysburg, OH vs Grayling, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Perrysburg, OH vs Grayling, MI.
| Data | Perrysburg | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,161 | 1,917 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 48.8 years |
| Median Income | $98,419 | $30,417 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Perrysburg vs Grayling
- In Perrysburg, the population is higher at 25,161, compared to 1,917 in Grayling.
- The median age in Grayling is higher at 48.8 years, compared to 38.9 years in Perrysburg.
- Perrysburg has a higher median income of $98,419 compared to $30,417 in Grayling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Perrysburg at 42.0% compared to 26.0% in Grayling.
- The poverty level is higher in Grayling at 16%, compared to 6% in Perrysburg.
- The unemployment rate in Perrysburg is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Grayling.
Demographics
Demographics Perrysburg vs Grayling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Perrysburg | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 87 | 88 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Perrysburg vs Grayling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Perrysburg at 2% compared to 1% in Grayling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grayling at 88% compared to 87% in Perrysburg.
- The Asian population is larger in Perrysburg at 3% compared to 1% in Grayling.
- Grayling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Perrysburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Perrysburg at 4% compared to 3% in Grayling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Perrysburg and Grayling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Perrysburg | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Perrysburg vs Grayling
- In Grayling, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.3% in Perrysburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grayling at 26.4% versus 22.5% in Perrysburg.
- Grayling has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 12.1% in Perrysburg.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Perrysburg and Grayling at 19.0%.
- Grayling has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.6% in Perrysburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grayling at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Perrysburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Perrysburg | Grayling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (53) | 0.7% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 8.7% (2,192) | 17.3% (332) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (645) | 18.2% (348) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.5% (9,689) | 10.3% (197) |
Education Levels Comparison: Perrysburg vs Grayling
- In Grayling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Perrysburg.
- In Grayling, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 8.7% in Perrysburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grayling at 18.2%, compared to 2.6% in Perrysburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Perrysburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.5% compared to 10.3% in Grayling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.