Demographics details for Perry, GA vs Fancy farm, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Perry, GA vs Fancy farm, KY.
| Data | Perry | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,538 | 300 |
| Median Age | 36.5 years | 51.1 years |
| Median Income | $68,507 | $55,060 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Perry vs Fancy farm
- In Perry, the population is higher at 23,538, compared to 300 in Fancy farm.
- The median age in Fancy farm is higher at 51.1 years, compared to 36.5 years in Perry.
- Perry has a higher median income of $68,507 compared to $55,060 in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Perry at 36.0% compared to 31.0% in Fancy farm.
- Perry has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Fancy farm.
- The unemployment rate in Perry is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fancy farm.
Demographics
Demographics Perry vs Fancy farm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Perry | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 3 |
| White | 57 | 91 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Perry vs Fancy farm
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Perry at 28% compared to 3% in Fancy farm.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fancy farm at 91% compared to 57% in Perry.
- The Asian population is larger in Perry at 2% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Perry at 7% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fancy farm at 6%, compared to 5% in Perry.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Perry at 1% compared to 0% in Fancy farm.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Perry | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 27.3% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Perry vs Fancy farm
- In Fancy farm, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in Perry.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fancy farm at 27.3% versus 21.7% in Perry.
- Fancy farm has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 17.4% in Perry.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fancy farm at 16.7% compared to 16.6% in Perry.
- Obesity rates are higher in Perry at 38.7% compared to 37.4% in Fancy farm.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fancy farm at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Perry.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Perry | Fancy farm |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (128) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (3,492) | 47.7% (143) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (1,724) | 5.3% (16) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (4,144) | 14.3% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Perry vs Fancy farm
- A higher percentage of residents in Perry have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Fancy farm.
- In Fancy farm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 47.7% compared to 14.8% in Perry.
- More residents in Perry have less than a high school education at 7.3% compared to 5.3% in Fancy farm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Perry hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 14.3% in Fancy farm.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.