Demographics details for Perry hall, MD vs Ashburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Perry hall, MD vs Ashburn, GA.
| Data | Perry hall | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,255 | 4,174 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $103,061 | $35,987 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Perry hall vs Ashburn
- In Perry hall, the population is higher at 29,255, compared to 4,174 in Ashburn.
- The median age in Ashburn is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 38.9 years in Perry hall.
- Perry hall has a higher median income of $103,061 compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Perry hall at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Ashburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Ashburn at 12%, compared to 5% in Perry hall.
- Ashburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Perry hall.
Demographics
Demographics Perry hall vs Ashburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Perry hall | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 16 | 71 |
| White | 59 | 22 |
| Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Perry hall vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 71% compared to 16% in Perry hall.
- Perry hall has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 22% in Ashburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Perry hall at 14% compared to 0% in Ashburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Perry hall at 6% compared to 5% in Ashburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Perry hall at 5% compared to 2% in Ashburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Perry hall and Ashburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Perry hall | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 12.1% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Perry hall vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.2% in Perry hall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Perry hall at 22.7% compared to 21.2% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 12.1% in Perry hall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Perry hall at 16.1% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 33.1% in Perry hall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ashburn at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Perry hall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Perry hall | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (369) | 0.2% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (3,580) | 19.0% (791) |
| Less than High School | 8.8% (2,578) | 21.0% (875) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.4% (9,197) | 7.3% (304) |
Education Levels Comparison: Perry hall vs Ashburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Perry hall have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Ashburn.
- In Ashburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 12.2% in Perry hall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashburn at 21.0%, compared to 8.8% in Perry hall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Perry hall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.4% compared to 7.3% in Ashburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.