Demographics details for Pequot lakes, MN vs Swainsboro, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pequot lakes, MN vs Swainsboro, GA.

Data Pequot lakes Swainsboro
Population 2,440 7,583
Median Age 40.5 years 30.1 years
Median Income $73,125 $44,491
Married Families 41.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 9% 24%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Swainsboro

  • The population in Swainsboro is higher at 7,583, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
  • Residents in Pequot lakes have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
  • Pequot lakes has a higher median income of $73,125 compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pequot lakes at 41.0% compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Swainsboro at 24%, compared to 9% in Pequot lakes.
  • Swainsboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.

Demographics

Demographics Pequot lakes vs Swainsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pequot lakes Swainsboro
Black 1 57
White 94 33
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 4
Two or More Races 2 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Swainsboro

  • In Swainsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • Pequot lakes has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
  • The Asian population is larger in Pequot lakes at 1% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Swainsboro at 6%, compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pequot lakes at 1% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pequot lakes Swainsboro
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.5% 14.6%
Depression 23.3% 20.6%
Smoking 15.2% 22.6%
Binge Drinking 19.4% 13.6%
Obesity 30.3% 42.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Swainsboro

  • In Swainsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pequot lakes at 23.3% compared to 20.6% in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 15.2% in Pequot lakes.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
  • Swainsboro has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 30.3% in Pequot lakes.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pequot lakes Swainsboro
No Schooling 0.7% (17) 1.9% (147)
High School Diploma 14.0% (341) 16.7% (1,264)
Less than High School 3.4% (84) 11.6% (879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.7% (504) 6.6% (500)

Education Levels Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Swainsboro

  • In Swainsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.7% in Pequot lakes.
  • In Swainsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Swainsboro at 11.6%, compared to 3.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pequot lakes hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.