Demographics details for Pequot lakes, MN vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pequot lakes, MN vs South jordan, UT.

Data Pequot lakes South jordan
Population 2,440 83,513
Median Age 40.5 years 34.4 years
Median Income $73,125 $119,822
Married Families 41.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.7

Population Comparison: Pequot lakes vs South jordan

  • The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
  • Residents in Pequot lakes have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $73,125 in Pequot lakes.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Pequot lakes.
  • Pequot lakes has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.

Demographics

Demographics Pequot lakes vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pequot lakes South jordan
Black 1 Data is updating
White 94 83
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 1 7
Two or More Races 2 5
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs South jordan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pequot lakes at 1% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • Pequot lakes has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pequot lakes and South jordan at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pequot lakes South jordan
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.5% 9.0%
Depression 23.3% 26.5%
Smoking 15.2% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 19.4% 16.9%
Obesity 30.3% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 23.3% in Pequot lakes.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pequot lakes at 15.2% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pequot lakes at 30.3% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pequot lakes at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pequot lakes South jordan
No Schooling 0.7% (17) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 14.0% (341) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 3.4% (84) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.7% (504) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Pequot lakes vs South jordan

  • A higher percentage of residents in Pequot lakes have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pequot lakes hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • More residents in Pequot lakes have less than a high school education at 3.4% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 20.7% in Pequot lakes.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.