Demographics details for Pequot lakes, MN vs San leandro, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pequot lakes, MN vs San leandro, CA.

Data Pequot lakes San leandro
Population 2,440 86,762
Median Age 40.5 years 41.5 years
Median Income $73,125 $97,141
Married Families 41.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Pequot lakes vs San leandro

  • The population in San leandro is higher at 86,762, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
  • The median age in San leandro is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 40.5 years in Pequot lakes.
  • San leandro has a higher median income of $97,141, compared to $73,125 in Pequot lakes.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pequot lakes at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in San leandro.
  • The poverty level is higher in San leandro at 12%, compared to 9% in Pequot lakes.
  • San leandro has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.

Demographics

Demographics Pequot lakes vs San leandro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pequot lakes San leandro
Black 1 11
White 94 12
Asian 1 36
Hispanic 1 29
Two or More Races 2 11
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs San leandro

  • In San leandro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • Pequot lakes has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 12% in San leandro.
  • In San leandro, the Asian population stands at 36%, greater than 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • San leandro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San leandro at 11%, compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pequot lakes and San leandro at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pequot lakes San leandro
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 8.5% 9.9%
Depression 23.3% 16.8%
Smoking 15.2% 11.1%
Binge Drinking 19.4% 14.6%
Obesity 30.3% 26.7%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs San leandro

  • In San leandro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pequot lakes at 23.3% compared to 16.8% in San leandro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pequot lakes at 15.2% compared to 11.1% in San leandro.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 14.6% in San leandro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pequot lakes at 30.3% compared to 26.7% in San leandro.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pequot lakes at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in San leandro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pequot lakes San leandro
No Schooling 0.7% (17) 3.5% (2,999)
High School Diploma 14.0% (341) 16.2% (14,031)
Less than High School 3.4% (84) 17.8% (15,482)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.7% (504) 25.2% (21,903)

Education Levels Comparison: Pequot lakes vs San leandro

  • In San leandro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.7% in Pequot lakes.
  • In San leandro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San leandro at 17.8%, compared to 3.4% in Pequot lakes.
  • In San leandro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 20.7% in Pequot lakes.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.