Demographics details for Pequot lakes, MN vs Harbeson, DE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pequot lakes, MN vs Harbeson, DE.
Data | Pequot lakes | Harbeson |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,440 | 336 |
Median Age | 40.5 years | 45.0 years |
Median Income | $73,125 | $65,000 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Harbeson
- In Pequot lakes, the population is higher at 2,440, compared to 336 in Harbeson.
- The median age in Harbeson is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 40.5 years in Pequot lakes.
- Pequot lakes has a higher median income of $73,125 compared to $65,000 in Harbeson.
- In Harbeson, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 41.0% in Pequot lakes.
- Pequot lakes has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Harbeson.
- Harbeson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.
Demographics
Demographics Pequot lakes vs Harbeson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pequot lakes | Harbeson |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | 94 | 90 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Harbeson
- In Harbeson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- Pequot lakes has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 90% in Harbeson.
- Both Pequot lakes and Harbeson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Harbeson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- Both Pequot lakes and Harbeson have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pequot lakes at 1% compared to 0% in Harbeson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pequot lakes | Harbeson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 23.3% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 30.3% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Harbeson
- More residents in Pequot lakes report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pequot lakes at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pequot lakes at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pequot lakes at 30.3% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pequot lakes at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pequot lakes | Harbeson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (17) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.0% (341) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (84) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (504) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Harbeson
- A higher percentage of residents in Pequot lakes have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pequot lakes hold a high school diploma at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
- More residents in Pequot lakes have less than a high school education at 3.4% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pequot lakes hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in Harbeson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.