Demographics details for Penngrove, CA vs Thornton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Penngrove, CA vs Thornton, CO.
| Data | Penngrove | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,184 | 143,282 |
| Median Age | 59.0 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $97,237 | $95,064 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Penngrove vs Thornton
- The population in Thornton is higher at 143,282, compared to 2,184 in Penngrove.
- Residents in Penngrove have a higher median age of 59.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Penngrove has a higher median income of $97,237 compared to $95,064 in Thornton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Penngrove at 47.0% compared to 40.0% in Thornton.
- The poverty level is higher in Thornton at 9%, compared to 6% in Penngrove.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Penngrove and Thornton at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Penngrove vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Penngrove | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 60 | 39 |
| Asian | 4 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Penngrove vs Thornton
- In Thornton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Penngrove.
- Penngrove has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- In Thornton, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Penngrove.
- Thornton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 27% in Penngrove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thornton at 15%, compared to 9% in Penngrove.
- In Thornton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Penngrove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Penngrove | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 21.0% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Penngrove vs Thornton
- More residents in Penngrove report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Thornton at 22.0% versus 21.9% in Penngrove.
- Thornton has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 12.5% in Penngrove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 20.4% in Penngrove.
- Thornton has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 28.8% in Penngrove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Penngrove at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Penngrove | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (21) | 1.7% (2,448) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (160) | 13.2% (18,983) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (162) | 14.7% (20,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.2% (769) | 19.3% (27,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Penngrove vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.0% in Penngrove.
- In Thornton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 7.3% in Penngrove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thornton at 14.7%, compared to 7.4% in Penngrove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Penngrove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.2% compared to 19.3% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.