Demographics details for Penngrove, CA vs Hazel, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Penngrove, CA vs Hazel, KY.
| Data | Penngrove | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,184 | 398 |
| Median Age | 59.0 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $97,237 | $36,765 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Penngrove vs Hazel
- In Penngrove, the population is higher at 2,184, compared to 398 in Hazel.
- Residents in Penngrove have a higher median age of 59.0 years compared to 38.8 years in Hazel.
- Penngrove has a higher median income of $97,237 compared to $36,765 in Hazel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Penngrove at 47.0% compared to 38.0% in Hazel.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazel at 14%, compared to 6% in Penngrove.
- Hazel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Penngrove.
Demographics
Demographics Penngrove vs Hazel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Penngrove | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 60 | 76 |
| Asian | 4 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Penngrove vs Hazel
- In Hazel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Penngrove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hazel at 76% compared to 60% in Penngrove.
- In Hazel, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 4% in Penngrove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Penngrove at 27% compared to 3% in Hazel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Penngrove at 9% compared to 6% in Hazel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Penngrove and Hazel at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Penngrove | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Penngrove vs Hazel
- In Hazel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.6% in Penngrove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hazel at 27.6% versus 21.9% in Penngrove.
- Hazel has a higher smoking rate at 19.0% compared to 12.5% in Penngrove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Penngrove at 20.4% compared to 15.0% in Hazel.
- Hazel has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 28.8% in Penngrove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel at 35.0% compared to 18.0% in Penngrove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Penngrove | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (21) | 0.8% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (160) | 21.9% (87) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (162) | 21.1% (84) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.2% (769) | 9.0% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Penngrove vs Hazel
- A higher percentage of residents in Penngrove have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Hazel.
- In Hazel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 7.3% in Penngrove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazel at 21.1%, compared to 7.4% in Penngrove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Penngrove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.2% compared to 9.0% in Hazel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.