Demographics details for Penn valley, CA vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Penn valley, CA vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Penn valley | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,188 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 55.7 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $65,882 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Penn valley vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 1,188 in Penn valley.
- Residents in Penn valley have a higher median age of 55.7 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $65,882 in Penn valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Penn valley at 60.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- Penn valley has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Penn valley is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Penn valley vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Penn valley | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 86 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 7 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Penn valley vs South jordan
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Penn valley and South jordan at 0%.
- Penn valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Penn valley.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Penn valley and South jordan at 7%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Penn valley at 7% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Penn valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Penn valley | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.0% |
Depression | 22.9% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Penn valley vs South jordan
- More residents in Penn valley report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 22.9% in Penn valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Penn valley at 14.8% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Penn valley at 17.9% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Penn valley at 29.5% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Penn valley at 30.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Penn valley | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.9% (58) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (257) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 8.2% (98) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (146) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Penn valley vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Penn valley have no formal schooling at 4.9% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Penn valley hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Penn valley have less than a high school education at 8.2% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 12.3% in Penn valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.