Demographics details for Penelope, TX vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Penelope, TX vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Penelope | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 185 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,000 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 59.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Penelope vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 185 in Penelope.
- Residents in Penelope have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $55,000 in Penelope.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Penelope at 59.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- Penelope has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Penelope is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Penelope vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Penelope | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 22 |
| White | 44 | 59 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Penelope vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Penelope.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 59% compared to 44% in Penelope.
- Both Penelope and Clayton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Penelope at 39% compared to 13% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Penelope at 16% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Penelope and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Penelope | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Penelope vs Clayton
- More residents in Penelope report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Penelope at 24.8% compared to 23.1% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Penelope at 20.3% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Penelope at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 39.9%.
- Disability percentages are higher in Penelope at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Penelope | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 10.3% (19) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (47) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 36.8% (68) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (34) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Penelope vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Penelope have no formal schooling at 10.3% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Penelope hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Penelope have less than a high school education at 36.8% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 18.4% in Penelope.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.