Demographics details for Pendergrass, GA vs Wright, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pendergrass, GA vs Wright, WY.
Data | Pendergrass | Wright |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,758 | 1,640 |
Median Age | 31.8 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $73,947 | $88,150 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 55.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Pendergrass vs Wright
- In Pendergrass, the population is higher at 1,758, compared to 1,640 in Wright.
- The median age in Wright is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 31.8 years in Pendergrass.
- Wright has a higher median income of $88,150, compared to $73,947 in Pendergrass.
- In Wright, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 36.0% in Pendergrass.
- Pendergrass has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Wright.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Pendergrass and Wright at 2.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Pendergrass vs Wright provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pendergrass | Wright |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 1 |
White | 55 | 74 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 19 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pendergrass vs Wright
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pendergrass at 15% compared to 1% in Wright.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wright at 74% compared to 55% in Pendergrass.
- The Asian population is larger in Pendergrass at 3% compared to 1% in Wright.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pendergrass at 19% compared to 11% in Wright.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wright at 13%, compared to 8% in Pendergrass.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pendergrass and Wright at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pendergrass | Wright |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 14.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 9.7% |
Depression | 23.8% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 32.0% | 34.3% |
Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pendergrass vs Wright
- More residents in Pendergrass report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.3% in Wright.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pendergrass at 23.8% compared to 18.3% in Wright.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pendergrass at 18.6% compared to 16.8% in Wright.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wright at 19.0% compared to 17.1% in Pendergrass.
- Wright has higher obesity rates at 34.3% compared to 32.0% in Pendergrass.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wright at 7.0% compared to 4.0% in Pendergrass.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pendergrass | Wright |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (33) | 9.8% (160) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (239) | 20.5% (336) |
Less than High School | 18.0% (317) | 20.7% (340) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (201) | 7.0% (114) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pendergrass vs Wright
- In Wright, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 9.8% compared to 1.9% in Pendergrass.
- In Wright, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 13.6% in Pendergrass.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wright at 20.7%, compared to 18.0% in Pendergrass.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pendergrass hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 7.0% in Wright.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.