Demographics details for Pella, IA vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pella, IA vs Gardner, MA.
| Data | Pella | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,744 | 20,902 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $86,025 | $56,974 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Pella vs Gardner
- The population in Gardner is higher at 20,902, compared to 10,744 in Pella.
- The median age in Gardner is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 35.5 years in Pella.
- Pella has a higher median income of $86,025 compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pella at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- The poverty level is higher in Gardner at 9%, compared to 7% in Pella.
- Gardner has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 2.5% in Pella.
Demographics
Demographics Pella vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pella | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pella vs Gardner
- In Gardner, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Pella.
- Pella has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 82% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Pella.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Pella.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardner at 5%, compared to 2% in Pella.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pella and Gardner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pella | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pella vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.4% in Pella.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gardner at 24.4% versus 18.6% in Pella.
- Gardner has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 14.6% in Pella.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pella at 22.4% compared to 17.6% in Gardner.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pella at 35.5% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Pella.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pella | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (22) | 1.3% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (1,433) | 21.5% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (646) | 16.8% (3,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.3% (3,036) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pella vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Pella.
- In Gardner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 13.3% in Pella.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardner at 16.8%, compared to 6.0% in Pella.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pella hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.3% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.