Demographics details for Pella, IA vs Baldwin park, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pella, IA vs Baldwin park, CA.
| Data | Pella | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,744 | 69,455 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $86,025 | $76,002 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Pella vs Baldwin park
- The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 10,744 in Pella.
- The median age in Baldwin park is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 35.5 years in Pella.
- Pella has a higher median income of $86,025 compared to $76,002 in Baldwin park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pella at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
- The poverty level is higher in Baldwin park at 12%, compared to 7% in Pella.
- Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 2.5% in Pella.
Demographics
Demographics Pella vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pella | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 93 | -25 |
| Asian | 1 | 23 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 23 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Pella vs Baldwin park
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Pella and Baldwin park at 1%.
- Pella has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
- In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 1% in Pella.
- Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 3% in Pella.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 2% in Pella.
- In Baldwin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Pella.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pella | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 14.7% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 11.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pella vs Baldwin park
- In Baldwin park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.4% in Pella.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pella at 18.6% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pella at 14.6% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pella at 22.4% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pella at 35.5% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pella at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pella | Baldwin park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (22) | 5.5% (3,853) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (1,433) | 18.1% (12,587) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (646) | 41.7% (28,939) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.3% (3,036) | 9.8% (6,787) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pella vs Baldwin park
- In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.2% in Pella.
- In Baldwin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 13.3% in Pella.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 6.0% in Pella.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pella hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.3% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.