Demographics details for Pell city, AL vs Mountain home, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pell city, AL vs Mountain home, ID.
Data | Pell city | Mountain home |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,638 | 16,469 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $71,027 | $53,108 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Pell city vs Mountain home
- The population in Mountain home is higher at 16,469, compared to 13,638 in Pell city.
- Residents in Pell city have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 31.3 years in Mountain home.
- Pell city has a higher median income of $71,027 compared to $53,108 in Mountain home.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pell city at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Mountain home.
- The poverty level is identical in both Pell city and Mountain home at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Pell city is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Mountain home.
Demographics
Demographics Pell city vs Mountain home provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pell city | Mountain home |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 2 |
White | 78 | 69 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 1 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Pell city vs Mountain home
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pell city at 17% compared to 2% in Mountain home.
- Pell city has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 69% in Mountain home.
- In Mountain home, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Pell city.
- Mountain home has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 1% in Pell city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mountain home at 9%, compared to 2% in Pell city.
- In Mountain home, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Pell city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pell city | Mountain home |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.6% |
Depression | 24.7% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 15.8% |
Obesity | 41.0% | 36.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pell city vs Mountain home
- More residents in Pell city report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.9% in Mountain home.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pell city at 24.7% compared to 22.4% in Mountain home.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pell city at 20.1% compared to 18.3% in Mountain home.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mountain home at 15.8% compared to 14.6% in Pell city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pell city at 41.0% compared to 36.1% in Mountain home.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain home at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Pell city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pell city | Mountain home |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (109) | 1.7% (273) |
High School Diploma | 18.9% (2,574) | 16.3% (2,690) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (1,759) | 12.8% (2,116) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (1,899) | 10.4% (1,720) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pell city vs Mountain home
- In Mountain home, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Pell city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pell city hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
- More residents in Pell city have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 12.8% in Mountain home.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pell city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 10.4% in Mountain home.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.