Demographics details for Pell city, AL vs Mountain home, ID

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pell city, AL vs Mountain home, ID.

Data Pell city Mountain home
Population 13,638 16,469
Median Age 38.7 years 31.3 years
Median Income $71,027 $53,108
Married Families 43.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.1

Population Comparison: Pell city vs Mountain home

  • The population in Mountain home is higher at 16,469, compared to 13,638 in Pell city.
  • Residents in Pell city have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 31.3 years in Mountain home.
  • Pell city has a higher median income of $71,027 compared to $53,108 in Mountain home.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pell city at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Mountain home.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Pell city and Mountain home at 12%.
  • The unemployment rate in Pell city is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Mountain home.

Demographics

Demographics Pell city vs Mountain home provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pell city Mountain home
Black 17 2
White 78 69
Asian 2 4
Hispanic 1 14
Two or More Races 2 9
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Pell city vs Mountain home

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pell city at 17% compared to 2% in Mountain home.
  • Pell city has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 69% in Mountain home.
  • In Mountain home, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Pell city.
  • Mountain home has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 1% in Pell city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mountain home at 9%, compared to 2% in Pell city.
  • In Mountain home, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Pell city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pell city Mountain home
Mental Health Not Good 19.6% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 12.6%
Depression 24.7% 22.4%
Smoking 20.1% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 15.8%
Obesity 41.0% 36.1%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pell city vs Mountain home

  • More residents in Pell city report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.9% in Mountain home.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Pell city at 24.7% compared to 22.4% in Mountain home.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pell city at 20.1% compared to 18.3% in Mountain home.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mountain home at 15.8% compared to 14.6% in Pell city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pell city at 41.0% compared to 36.1% in Mountain home.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain home at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Pell city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pell city Mountain home
No Schooling 0.8% (109) 1.7% (273)
High School Diploma 18.9% (2,574) 16.3% (2,690)
Less than High School 12.9% (1,759) 12.8% (2,116)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.9% (1,899) 10.4% (1,720)

Education Levels Comparison: Pell city vs Mountain home

  • In Mountain home, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Pell city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pell city hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in Mountain home.
  • More residents in Pell city have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 12.8% in Mountain home.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Pell city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 10.4% in Mountain home.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.