Demographics details for Pell city, AL vs Island park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pell city, AL vs Island park, NY.
Data | Pell city | Island park |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,638 | 4,969 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 42.7 years |
Median Income | $71,027 | $96,875 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pell city vs Island park
- In Pell city, the population is higher at 13,638, compared to 4,969 in Island park.
- The median age in Island park is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 38.7 years in Pell city.
- Island park has a higher median income of $96,875, compared to $71,027 in Pell city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pell city at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Island park.
- Pell city has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Island park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Pell city and Island park at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Pell city vs Island park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pell city | Island park |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 1 |
White | 78 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | 4 |
Hispanic | 1 | 33 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pell city vs Island park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pell city at 17% compared to 1% in Island park.
- Pell city has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 56% in Island park.
- In Island park, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Pell city.
- Island park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 1% in Pell city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Island park at 6%, compared to 2% in Pell city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pell city and Island park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pell city | Island park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.8% |
Depression | 24.7% | 17.4% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 41.0% | 29.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pell city vs Island park
- More residents in Pell city report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.6% in Island park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pell city at 24.7% compared to 17.4% in Island park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pell city at 20.1% compared to 14.1% in Island park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Island park at 17.9% compared to 14.6% in Pell city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pell city at 41.0% compared to 29.5% in Island park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pell city at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Island park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pell city | Island park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (109) | 0.5% (27) |
High School Diploma | 18.9% (2,574) | 27.9% (1,388) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (1,759) | 8.9% (443) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (1,899) | 16.5% (819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pell city vs Island park
- A higher percentage of residents in Pell city have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Island park.
- In Island park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 18.9% in Pell city.
- More residents in Pell city have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 8.9% in Island park.
- In Island park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 13.9% in Pell city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.