Demographics details for Pell city, AL vs Harrison, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pell city, AL vs Harrison, AR.
Data | Pell city | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,638 | 13,338 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 41.8 years |
Median Income | $71,027 | $39,677 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Pell city vs Harrison
- In Pell city, the population is higher at 13,638, compared to 13,338 in Harrison.
- The median age in Harrison is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 38.7 years in Pell city.
- Pell city has a higher median income of $71,027 compared to $39,677 in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pell city at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Harrison.
- The poverty level is higher in Harrison at 15%, compared to 12% in Pell city.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Pell city and Harrison at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Pell city vs Harrison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pell city | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | Data is updating |
White | 78 | 92 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pell city vs Harrison
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pell city at 17% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harrison at 92% compared to 78% in Pell city.
- The Asian population is larger in Pell city at 2% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Pell city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harrison at 4%, compared to 2% in Pell city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pell city and Harrison at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pell city | Harrison |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.1% |
Depression | 24.7% | 28.9% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 24.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 41.0% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pell city vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.6% in Pell city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrison at 28.9% versus 24.7% in Pell city.
- Harrison has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 20.1% in Pell city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harrison at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in Pell city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pell city at 41.0% compared to 40.7% in Harrison.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harrison at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Pell city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pell city | Harrison |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (109) | 0.9% (115) |
High School Diploma | 18.9% (2,574) | 21.0% (2,807) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (1,759) | 12.5% (1,665) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (1,899) | 13.1% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pell city vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Pell city.
- In Harrison, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 18.9% in Pell city.
- More residents in Pell city have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 12.5% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pell city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 13.1% in Harrison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.