Demographics details for Pekin, IL vs Paterson, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pekin, IL vs Paterson, NJ.
| Data | Pekin | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,260 | 156,661 |
| Median Age | 41.2 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $52,507 | $52,092 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 8.8 |
Population Comparison: Pekin vs Paterson
- The population in Paterson is higher at 156,661, compared to 31,260 in Pekin.
- Residents in Pekin have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 33.1 years in Paterson.
- Pekin has a higher median income of $52,507 compared to $52,092 in Paterson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pekin at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Paterson.
- The poverty level is higher in Paterson at 18%, compared to 12% in Pekin.
- Paterson has a higher unemployment rate at 8.8% compared to 6.4% in Pekin.
Demographics
Demographics Pekin vs Paterson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pekin | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 25 |
| White | 89 | Data is updating |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pekin vs Paterson
- In Paterson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 3% in Pekin.
- Pekin has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 0% in Paterson.
- In Paterson, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Pekin.
- Paterson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 3% in Pekin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Paterson at 17%, compared to 4% in Pekin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pekin and Paterson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pekin | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 16.5% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pekin vs Paterson
- In Paterson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 17.3% in Pekin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pekin at 23.2% compared to 16.5% in Paterson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pekin at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Paterson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pekin at 17.3% compared to 13.9% in Paterson.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 38.0%.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pekin at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Paterson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pekin | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (204) | 2.1% (3,278) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (6,641) | 25.1% (39,354) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (4,351) | 26.1% (40,961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (4,126) | 7.9% (12,450) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pekin vs Paterson
- In Paterson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Pekin.
- In Paterson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 21.2% in Pekin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paterson at 26.1%, compared to 13.9% in Pekin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pekin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 7.9% in Paterson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.