Demographics details for Pekin, IL vs Cherokee, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pekin, IL vs Cherokee, OK.
| Data | Pekin | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,260 | 48,098 |
| Median Age | 41.2 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $52,507 | $52,410 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.4 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Pekin vs Cherokee
- The population in Cherokee is higher at 48,098, compared to 31,260 in Pekin.
- Residents in Pekin have a higher median age of 41.2 years compared to 36.5 years in Cherokee.
- Pekin has a higher median income of $52,507 compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Pekin.
- The poverty level is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 12% in Pekin.
- The unemployment rate in Pekin is higher at 6.4%, compared to 4.6% in Cherokee.
Demographics
Demographics Pekin vs Cherokee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pekin | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 42 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 33 |
Demographics Comparison: Pekin vs Cherokee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pekin at 3% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
- Pekin has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
- Both Pekin and Cherokee have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Cherokee has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Pekin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 4% in Pekin.
- In Cherokee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 0% in Pekin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pekin | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 23.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pekin vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.3% in Pekin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cherokee at 26.6% versus 23.2% in Pekin.
- Cherokee has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 19.8% in Pekin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pekin at 17.3% compared to 13.8% in Cherokee.
- Cherokee has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 38.0% in Pekin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Pekin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pekin | Cherokee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (204) | 0.9% (433) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (6,641) | 15.6% (7,526) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (4,351) | 11.5% (5,552) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (4,126) | 17.9% (8,612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pekin vs Cherokee
- In Cherokee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Pekin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pekin hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 15.6% in Cherokee.
- More residents in Pekin have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 11.5% in Cherokee.
- In Cherokee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 13.2% in Pekin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.